Talk:Canadian rapper Bad News Brown murdered in Montreal

Review of revision 1179311 [Failed]

Revision 1179311 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See below. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Several passages are lifted directly from sources. You should be using your own, entirely different ways of presenting all the information you choose to present, while at the same time not distorting any of that information from what can be verified from the sources. Changing a few words here and there does not prevent plagiarism and does tend to distort meaning. (If I sound a bit preachy, that's 'cause I'm trying out phrasings for possible use at WN:Plagiarism.) Some examples: I noticed the third sentence of the lede has a passage nine words long identical to CTV. The first sentence of the third paragraph has a passage seven words long identical (but for replacing "Montreal" with "Canada") to CTV, and another passage eleven words long identical (but for removing the words "in Montreal") to the Sun. There could be more such passages later; I didn't check beyond that point. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1179311 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See below. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Several passages are lifted directly from sources. You should be using your own, entirely different ways of presenting all the information you choose to present, while at the same time not distorting any of that information from what can be verified from the sources. Changing a few words here and there does not prevent plagiarism and does tend to distort meaning. (If I sound a bit preachy, that's 'cause I'm trying out phrasings for possible use at WN:Plagiarism.) Some examples: I noticed the third sentence of the lede has a passage nine words long identical to CTV. The first sentence of the third paragraph has a passage seven words long identical (but for replacing "Montreal" with "Canada") to CTV, and another passage eleven words long identical (but for removing the words "in Montreal") to the Sun. There could be more such passages later; I didn't check beyond that point. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

I did some c/e, but please clarify what you mean? Because i see it as ready to publish, but if you refer to the quotes, they are statements released by these people, essentially a press release. So the use of these direct quotes are allowed. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 22:41, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1179622 [Passed]

Revision 1179622 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:43, 14 February 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1179622 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:43, 14 February 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.