Talk:BP lose laptop containing sensitive claimant data
Review of revision 1204561 [Failed]
edit
Revision 1204561 of this article has been reviewed by Bobby122 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Once those are clarified, I can finish reviewing for NPOV and Style. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1204561 of this article has been reviewed by Bobby122 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Once those are clarified, I can finish reviewing for NPOV and Style. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- Special software: Cnn article, 4th paragraph, "The loss of the laptop, which can be remotely disabled", Will have that rephrased because I was assuming they had w:LoJack. Phearson (talk) 04:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- ENWiki on the article listed, makes that claim of the amount of oil spilled. I have added the ref from there to here. Phearson (talk) 04:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- The ref format is never used on Wikinews articles.
- Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source; you may, from there, lift the source they cite - provided it is accessible and you have verified it backs you up.
- This could do with far more use of active voice. --Brian McNeil / talk 06:39, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- The error has been fixed. Though I am at a lost to what exactly needs to be active. Phearson (talk) 12:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1204941 [Passed]
edit
Revision 1204941 of this article has been reviewed by Rayboy8 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:43, 30 March 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1204941 of this article has been reviewed by Rayboy8 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:43, 30 March 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |