Talk:Authorities blockade Chinese town rebelling over land dispute

Xinhua searches

Some sample searches of English-language Xinhua which demonstrate online blackout

1. Wukan with no other terms

# Yunnan, none relevant with wide search, plus property, or plus land.

1. Guangdong wide search plus property plus land

There don't seem to be any other spellings for Wukan, so I think saying there is a blackout is supported. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 16:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Corrected. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 17:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

The third Guangdong search is internally "property" rather than "land" (but I did check it with "land"). --Pi zero (talk) 17:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Ran the search, obviously failed to re-copy the new URL to the clipboard. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 19:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1342301 [Passed]

Revision 1342301 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The article as-is actually doesn't directly describe the blockade that features in the headline. (On reflection, though, I'm neither holding it up nor renaming it for that.) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1342301 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The article as-is actually doesn't directly describe the blockade that features in the headline. (On reflection, though, I'm neither holding it up nor renaming it for that.) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

(Duh, last paragraph.) --Pi zero (talk) 21:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)