Talk:Australian shooters start their 2012 Paralympic campaign

journalist notes

Sitting next to Australian Nick Sullivan who is the Team Manager. He said the Koreans and Chinese had good medal chances along with both Australians. The Iraqi was mentioned for human interest. --LauraHale (talk) 08:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Sullivan said that Natalie was slow in starting, took a while to settle in. She took a large number of practice shots before shooting. Kosmala shot 99/100 in the span it took Natalie to take her first shot according to Sullivan. The board confirmed this score of 99. With 5 shots into the second round, she had 49/50, getting a 9 on the fifth shot. The board shows that Smith shot 80/80 in her first 8 shots in her first round.--LauraHale (talk) 08:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Above is start list. --LauraHale (talk) 08:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

When Smith did get going, she scored 98 out of 100, having perfect for the first 8 shots. Board showed this live with 10/10/10/10 until the 9th where she shot 9. And then 9 again in 10th. --LauraHale (talk) 08:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Kosmala finished with 391/400, with 99 in first set, 96 in second, 98 in third and 98 in fourth. This was displayed on the scoreboard.

Same time, Nataliue finished with 98, 99, 97 and 98 to finish with 392. --LauraHale (talk) 09:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1604124 [Passed]

Revision 1604124 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The start list shows a third Chinese competitor; didn't feel I could treat the omission as a minor mistake and add the name. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1604124 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The start list shows a third Chinese competitor; didn't feel I could treat the omission as a minor mistake and add the name. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.