Talk:Australian Sex Party to run independents in Queensland election

Review

Revision 775074 of this article has been reviewed by Skenmy (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Nice. --Cirt (talk) 13:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 775074 of this article has been reviewed by Skenmy (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Nice. --Cirt (talk) 13:03, 27 February 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

No discussion in article of Sex Party's response to Christian Lobby's comments

The Christian Lobby made some pretty strong remarks about the Sex Party and what it stands for; comments that the Sex Party probably has a response to. The Christian Lobby's portrayal of and implications about the sex party are of course biased by the Christian Lobby's worldview. I would like to hear what the Sex Party has to say, for balance. Reading the articles/ stubs on the Sex Party and Fiona Patten (leader of the party) indicate that the Christian Lobby's comments are liable to be misinformed and/or misleading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.183.140.66 (talk) 03:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)