Talk:Australia earns one medal on day three of 2012 IPC Nor-Am Cup

Journalist notes

The verification for the awards is in an ogg file on dropbox. I e-mailed a photograph to scoop with some supplemental information which includes classes of all the competitors and their numbers. The scoreboards are on the article itself for verification. Beyond that, I was there and attended the whole award ceremony and this was the only Australian medal. Was a let down from the previous day. --LauraHale (talk) 14:28, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

points: I tried to send this to scoop but if it is not there, I uploaded to Dropbox.--LauraHale (talk) 16:15, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Something did finally arrive from you on scoop (though I haven't read it yet). --Pi zero (talk) 17:22, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Good good. That should confirm the ICPAS points (Melissa Perrine interview confirms her details. Listed as see also.) and it should also confirm the classification. I wish I had that for other dates. An Australian is on that list that I do not have on my list from the APC's list. The audio that confirms that medal information is available on the article itself as I think the last "image". I do not have the times for Victoria because I could not find an image with them. The time information is also available amongst the images. The source used confirms the race today and the race mentioned earlier. --LauraHale (talk) 17:37, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Lots of skiers fell. You can see this with all the DNFs. I have pictures that I do not have uploaded because internet is slow. --LauraHale (talk) 14:57, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1738045 [Passed]

Revision 1738045 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:08, 13 December 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1738045 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:08, 13 December 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.