Talk:Australia announces plans to close five mainland refugee detention centres

Review of revision 2314260 [Not ready]

Revision 2314260 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: These sources are all ABC. I realize ABC may be doing most of the coverage, but we need to draw from multiple independent sources (draw from, not just cite). Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: The lede needs to say when the focal event occurred (the announcement). Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 2314260 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: These sources are all ABC. I realize ABC may be doing most of the coverage, but we need to draw from multiple independent sources (draw from, not just cite). Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: The lede needs to say when the focal event occurred (the announcement). Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

• I'm very busy today, so my reviewing will be very choppy, but I intend to get this finished within a few hours. --Bddpaux (talk) 15:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Review of revision 2317943 [Passed]

Revision 2317943 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Generally speaking, a solid article. Some sentences/paragraphs, though, were just crazy long....did a little cleanup on those (and probably overstepped parameters of 'Reviewer' but I didn't want this good submission to go stale). Outstanding job with wikifying!! Also excellent work on 'Related news' and source structuring! --Bddpaux (talk) 00:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 2317943 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Generally speaking, a solid article. Some sentences/paragraphs, though, were just crazy long....did a little cleanup on those (and probably overstepped parameters of 'Reviewer' but I didn't want this good submission to go stale). Outstanding job with wikifying!! Also excellent work on 'Related news' and source structuring! --Bddpaux (talk) 00:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

• Also, I'm still not totally convinced that you'd properly addressed Pi Zero's problem with the first submission, so I (rather lamely) fixed it. --Bddpaux (talk) 00:47, 17 January 2014 (UTC)