Talk:Attorney John Wolfe wins 42% against President Obama in Arkansas primary

Map & other issues

I am placing the map here for now to not cause an edit conflict during the review: File:2012 Arkansas Democratic Primary by County.PNG.--William S. Saturn (talk) 04:10, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Also, I worded the first sentence on paragraph 6 badly and so would like to reword it: "Regardless of whether the party ultimately awards the delegates, some analysts say the results provide insights into voters' perception of Obama."--William S. Saturn (talk) 04:15, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1508699 [Passed]

Revision 1508699 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:45, 24 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Adopted the rephrase suggested above. Added the map provided above. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1508699 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:45, 24 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Adopted the rephrase suggested above. Added the map provided above. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

He lost

He lost. He did not "win" like the headline implies, and all the speculation is rather inappropriate. It contains lines like "previously unknown challengers such as Wolfe have qualified for delegates." - did Wolfe qualify for delegates? No. 86.178.198.128 (talk) 23:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Maybe you should actually read the article.--William S. Saturn (talk) 23:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC)