Talk:AFCON 2013: Hosts South Africa draw 0-0 with Cape Verde Islands

Questions

What sport is this? When did this happen? Is disappointing a neutral word? It isn't clear from the title that these are national teams, when this happened and why the the result was disappointing (and to whom it was disappointing). --LauraHale (talk) 20:58, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

I have reviewed your points and it stats football tournament in the first sentence. It's the Africa Cup of Nations and says hosts South Africa so I think its clear they are national teams. I did wonder about the disappointing comment but as the host of the tournament against a team making its debut its a fair comment. Hope this helps Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 22:46, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1778386 [Not ready]

Revision 1778386 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:22, 20 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I commented on the talk page to address this issue, but it is completely unclear when this happened. The context for why this was disappointing appears to be NPOV. Were they expected to win? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1778386 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:22, 20 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I commented on the talk page to address this issue, but it is completely unclear when this happened. The context for why this was disappointing appears to be NPOV. Were they expected to win? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1778412 [Not ready]

Revision 1778412 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:12, 20 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: POV problems are still present. Disappointing needs to be removed... or moved to a separate paragraph to better explain why this draw is disappointing. Best chance needs some support as it also appears potentially NPOV problem. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Second sentence could also use a where this game was played. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1778412 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:12, 20 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: POV problems are still present. Disappointing needs to be removed... or moved to a separate paragraph to better explain why this draw is disappointing. Best chance needs some support as it also appears potentially NPOV problem. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Second sentence could also use a where this game was played. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Thanks

thanks for reading the feedback. :) Much appreciated. It looks much closer to being ready to publish. I've asked pi zero to review off wiki because of that. --LauraHale (talk) 14:10, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1779860 [Passed]

Revision 1779860 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:54, 21 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1779860 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:54, 21 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.