Talk:50,000 people refuse evacuation after flooding in India caused by river changing course

Peer review

Note: An updated peer review (which passed) can be seen below the failed peer review. Anonymous101^talk 20:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision 690594 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Not checked due to style issues. NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Not properly formated as a news story. Improper tense. Needs a rewrite. Comments by reviewer: I fixed what I can, but can't do it all. It really does need a rewrite to get this up to scratch. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 690594 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Not checked due to style issues. NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Not properly formated as a news story. Improper tense. Needs a rewrite. Comments by reviewer: I fixed what I can, but can't do it all. It really does need a rewrite to get this up to scratch. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

done a large rewrite. Anonymous101^talk 19:23, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

what's a reer review? --SVTCobra 20:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

It's like a rear review, but more like peer review. It's confusing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Calebrw (talk • contribs)

Rewrite

TO adress the issues raised above, and to make the article refocus on a current event,, I am doing a large rewrite. Anonymous101^talk 18:50, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer review

Revision 690664 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:16, 9 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Much better. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 690664 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:16, 9 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Much better. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.