Talk:30,000-year-old Austrian statue traced to stone from Italy

Review of revision 4664166 [Not ready]

Revision 4664166 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Only one independent source (U Vienna & article itself do not count). Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4664166 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Only one independent source (U Vienna & article itself do not count). Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

While many other news outlets republished the press release, Live Science did not: [1]. The author's credentials are listed. Darkfrog24 (talk) 04:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

status?

stale?/or saveable?

Rising79Backfire (talk) 10:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Well it's a science news article. That's a little different from a regular news article. It's obviously news, but it's not exactly an event the way the starting of a criminal trial or the invasion of a country is. In almost any science news article, the important events—the discoveries and experiments—happen weeks or months (or in this case, arguably tens of thousands of years) before the actual publication of the paper. The real question for staleness is how likely it is that our readers have already heard this information. There's almost always a lag between publication of the paper and its press release and corroboration in independent sources. Darkfrog24 (talk) 14:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Review of revision 4664770 [Passed]

Revision 4664770 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 05:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: 'Deity of love' not 'Roman' but that's pedantic. Understand even if you're American, precise measurements, if in metric, should precede. Please remove ampersand '&' from final source & replace w comma ','. Good article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4664770 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 05:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: 'Deity of love' not 'Roman' but that's pedantic. Understand even if you're American, precise measurements, if in metric, should precede. Please remove ampersand '&' from final source & replace w comma ','. Good article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.