Talk:16-year-old girl charged with attempted murder in Melbourne, Australia

Review of revision 3578571 [Not ready]

Revision 3578571 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:57, 10 June 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: This is below minimal length for a Wikinews article. It does have three paragraphs, which is one of the usual requirements, but it's three short paragraphs. Total text should be a number of sentences longer; perhaps another 2/3 as much text as is already here, twice would be quite safe. The headline should say what part of the world this happened in. The lede should say when it happened (note the advice at WN:five Ws and H that if the lede doesn't contain a "day" word, something's probably wrong). I fixed some small stuff; see the detailed history of edits during review. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 3578571 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:57, 10 June 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: This is below minimal length for a Wikinews article. It does have three paragraphs, which is one of the usual requirements, but it's three short paragraphs. Total text should be a number of sentences longer; perhaps another 2/3 as much text as is already here, twice would be quite safe. The headline should say what part of the world this happened in. The lede should say when it happened (note the advice at WN:five Ws and H that if the lede doesn't contain a "day" word, something's probably wrong). I fixed some small stuff; see the detailed history of edits during review. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Hi Pizero,

Thank you for reviewing the article.

I have fixed everything that you suggested but I am struggling with the length of the article. As it was only a short story and there isn't a lot of information I could only make it 2-3 sentences longer.

Kind regards, Michelle

̜ Uowmlb (talk) 22:58, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

The length looks much better now. --Pi zero (talk) 23:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Review of revision 3581423 [Passed]

Revision 3581423 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: We've struggled with length here, and lost some bits during review, but on balance of text and content, this now feels sufficient to me. I'm unclear whether the "charge" event should be understood to take place at the time of arrest or at the time of court appearance. If it's the court appearance, that would explain the otherwise puzzling bit about five days after the alleged attack. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 3581423 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: We've struggled with length here, and lost some bits during review, but on balance of text and content, this now feels sufficient to me. I'm unclear whether the "charge" event should be understood to take place at the time of arrest or at the time of court appearance. If it's the court appearance, that would explain the otherwise puzzling bit about five days after the alleged attack. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.