Comments:United Kingdom will compensate Iraqi victims of abuse
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Do terrorist compensate for their victims? --66.229.34.63 15:32, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Torn
editOn one hand, the Iraqi victims do deserve compensation, but on the other hand, this will look very, very band for the United States for not also giving compensation. Let's see how the major news corporations spin this... - w:User:Poe Joe 16:43, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
How will they be able to do that?
editEverything is going bankrupt... Besides, the "War on Terror" created far more terrorists than it destroyed... Do you really think that throwing money will change anything?
"You've made your bed, now lie in it", or "You reap what you sow".
You can choose between the two. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.242.244.101 (talk) 13:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)