Comments:South Australian father and daughter in sexual relationship

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

• Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
• Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
• You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Click here to add a new comment · Add onto existing comments

"The pair have been barred from having sex with each other, and will be observed by authorities, but have been allowed to continue living together."

I wonder what unlucky guys get the job of keeping an eye on them to make sure they aren't having sex.--66.75.48.94 00:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I may not agree with it, but isn't this victimless crime? Fephisto - (talk) 01:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

They had a child that died of a birth defect. That's when it stops being victim-less. Spacehusky - (talk) 02:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

If its incest but not for the sake of procreation then there is no moral fault in it. Let them do what the fuck they want to do. As long as they don't conceive any more children there will be no victims. Also, incest only raises the chances of congenital birth defects from 4% to about 8%, so big deal. Their government needs to get the fuck out of people's bedrooms. Rekov - (talk) 03:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

By Spacehusky's reasoning, why shouldn't we be monitoring genetic probabilities of defects for all sexual partners? Fephisto - (talk) 22:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I have no problem with that in principle. Spacehusky - (talk) 22:46, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Do you realize that if you do this, you've effectively banned sexual freedom? Out of curiosity, are you a utilitarian? Fephisto - (talk) 18:47, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Isn't this based on a Christian principle? If so then it is wrong. Enlil Ninlil - (talk) 23:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

oh...

its gross so gross its like hearing that a hippo had sex with a mutated sea bird to be honest and for serious i dont understand but if they love each other let them be together in prison much love snoo snoo and buttercake —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.14.53.46 (talk) 04:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

INCREDIBLE

I THINK THIS IS VERY SHOCKIN THE WORLD IS BECOMINGN WORST DAY BY DAY

WE NEED TO STOP THIS SOMEWHERE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.88.179.106 (talk) 08:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Well at least we dont have 30 year wars, 100 year wars, crusades, and reduced the chance of a world war. Maybe Rome was better with thugs takeing revenge on their enemies (usually the other half of the population). You see the world isn't getting worse or better, it is just that our perspective drives this view. Though genecide has been around for thousands of years. Enlil Ninlil - (talk) 23:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

this family looks like animals.what is the differnts betwen the animals and humanbeings.What is the fathers duty. he must look after his daugthers life.this is the differnts betwen islam.The Islam is not allow, such kind of things. So I like Islamic ways.also Tibetian people also dont likes such kind of bad things.I am being chinese I like Tibetian people very much and they are so brave men so Strong.they never afraid of any people and so religeous.I got suprise some people said he is not good man. but I heard that he got Nobel prize. how bad man got Nobel prize —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.82.167.156 (talk) 18:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Love is sex!

If they love each other they understand each other they should continue doing so and producing new children because their sexual and physical needs meet both ends! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MZRSial (talk • contribs) 10:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)