Comments:Scottish prosecutors keeping quiet about Lanarkshire surgical deaths

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
short memories100:58, 26 February 2012

short memories

as the doctors of the scottish government said that al-Megrahi (lockerbie bomber) was to be released because he had less than 3 months to live and he was still alive more than 18 months latter in libya might suggest at least two things. one: the most charitable of you will recognise certain failings amongst scottish doctors, that is if there was not a hidden agenda. if there was a hidden agenda, you will also recognise, but for different reasons, failings amongst scottish doctors. two: post-operative care, indeed any care must be looked at holistically. in my humble opinion, there have been certain failings in british infrastructures (political, communicative, a mendacious press, corruption etc.) that have resulted not only the release of al-Megrahi but the alienation of those best suited to perform post-operative care.

Cinnamon (talk)00:59, 24 February 2012

Or, perhaps a few doctors in an entire country just happen to not be up to standard. Or al-Megrahi recovered unexpectedly (medical estimates are never perfect) and there was no shadowy conspiracy.

Bisected8 (talk)00:58, 26 February 2012