Comments:Scientology guilty of fraud rules French appeal court

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

What are your thoughts on the France appeals court ruling upholding the conviction of fraud for the Scientology organization?

Thoughts???

-- Cirt (talk)23:21, 2 February 2012

as in THINKING...that thing you do with your brain. IF you have one...156.8.251.250 (talk) 03:42, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

156.8.251.250 (talk)03:42, 3 February 2012

I think Scientology is just as much a scam as Christianity. France ought to haul the Pope in next for the same treatment.

150.148.0.65 (talk)22:37, 6 February 2012
 

Hopefully this ruling helps the States realize that they're allowing a Slave-Trafficking, murderous, fraudulent cult have religious protection, and start seeing them for what they really are: A threat to their National Security.

Aceman67 (talk)13:15, 8 February 2012
 

Comments from feedback form - "Some of the sentence structure..."

Some of the sentence structure could've used a little tightening up in places.

Bddpaux (talk)23:54, 2 February 2012

So could your mom.

Sorry, I couldn't resist. FYI this is not the place to critique the article's writing, that would be Collaboration Page. This is the place to express your opinions and thoughts on the matter. By the way, what are your thoughts on this matter?

67.142.172.23 (talk)01:37, 5 February 2012