Open main menu

Comments:Sandra Fluke named candidate for Time's 100 most influential people

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Comments from feedback form - "Time Magazine is a arm of the ..."116:46, 5 April 2012
She makes her case.302:09, 4 April 2012
Pff.322:42, 3 April 2012

Comments from feedback form - "Time Magazine is a arm of the ..."

Time Magazine is a arm of the democratic party and this girl was used to promote a cause, she was simply a pawn that was used to promote a false agenda for O’bummer and his cronies.

76.188.5.164 (talk)16:36, 5 April 2012

Any evidence to back up any of your spurious claims?

-- Cirt (talk)16:46, 5 April 2012
 

She makes her case.

Remember guys, this affects you too.

I'm a man and I have to agree with Sandra. I'm actually quite surprised to find out that birth control drugs are not covered by healthcare plans. Women need a doctor visit and a prescription to buy it..and it's not covered? Something is clearly wrong here.

Given the comment below, I hope they put her on the cover.

74.71.142.185 (talk)23:59, 2 April 2012

That would indeed be quite an interesting development were that to occur. Thanks very much for your comment.

-- Cirt (talk)04:53, 3 April 2012
 

Oh shut up you self-righteous, effete liberal pussy.

98.250.168.229 (talk)09:32, 3 April 2012

More trolling, fascinating.

-- Cirt (talk)02:09, 4 April 2012
 
 

Fuck that slut.

98.250.168.229 (talk)12:57, 2 April 2012

Ah, trollspace.

Pi zero (talk)13:43, 2 April 2012

Indeed. :(

-- Cirt (talk)13:56, 2 April 2012
 

If she gets her way, you CAN and not be stuck with child support payments for eighteen years. Nice, right? 24.158.162.216 (talk) 22:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

24.158.162.216 (talk)22:42, 3 April 2012