Comments:Sandra Fluke named candidate for Time's 100 most influential people
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
Comments from feedback form - "Time Magazine is a arm of the ..." | 1 | 16:46, 5 April 2012 |
She makes her case. | 3 | 02:09, 4 April 2012 |
Pff. | 3 | 22:42, 3 April 2012 |
Time Magazine is a arm of the democratic party and this girl was used to promote a cause, she was simply a pawn that was used to promote a false agenda for O’bummer and his cronies.
Remember guys, this affects you too.
I'm a man and I have to agree with Sandra. I'm actually quite surprised to find out that birth control drugs are not covered by healthcare plans. Women need a doctor visit and a prescription to buy it..and it's not covered? Something is clearly wrong here.
Given the comment below, I hope they put her on the cover.
Fuck that slut.
If she gets her way, you CAN and not be stuck with child support payments for eighteen years. Nice, right? 24.158.162.216 (talk) 22:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)