Comments:Pirates capture Saudi oil tanker

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

ARRRRRR!!!!! (in no way do i support the actions of the pirates)

For realEdit

if they are Pirates, why go their by the Coast? Why this ships don't have escorts? USA,NATO and even Russia has ships off Somalia. And they can't even protect a ship with tanks on broad let alone a oil tanker? --KDP3 (talk) 04:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

The excuse I read was that the deep sea off Kenya was not considered risky. The naval protection is concentrated round Somalia, many hundreds of miles from this hijack. Clearly the pirates knew this as well. --InfantGorilla (talk) 21:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
830 km is pretty far from the coast. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:09, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

India is the superpower in the region and their navy is large enough. Cost to operate an navy operation far from home will be huge. RGDS Alexmcfire —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexmcfire (talkcontribs) 06:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


Thoes are really mean pirates. They make cats look like good pets comparison optioned? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hotty (talkcontribs) 19:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)