Comments:Japan government panel urges reinterpretation of pacifist constitution

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

I don't see why the Japanese government would feel the need to get involved with other nations' troops. Seems like it would just open a can of worms for them. If it's because of North Korea, or to strengthen their position in the region, then the current deal they have with the U.S. involving military activities should be enough. I think Japan's current position in the international community is much more preferable: neutral in most outside conflicts, not much attention focused on them outside of their region. I'm unaware if Japan has ever been a target for terrorism, but making themselves more closely involved with the activities of more influential powers would definitely risk that.