Comments:Canadian victims of terrorism will be able to sue perpetrators
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Blood Red Sandman
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
I like this law.--66.229.17.49 (talk) 09:12, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- I do not. We do not need any more impetus for people to try and sue one another for quick monetary gains. Love of money is the root of all evil, after all.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 98.110.200.96 (talk • contribs)
- I like it. It is hardly a minor affair when your talking death or disability. Remember that most of the money from expensive cases tends to pay for healthcare related to the injury and effectively isn't truely the claimant's. (They can squander it if they really want to, but that would be stupid as medical bills don't pay themselves. Remember it is not their fault they have to pay them.) Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 15:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)