Comments:California lead bullet ban moves forward

Latest comment: 15 years ago by in topic Banning lead bullets won't save the California Condor

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Hey, whats the connection to lead bullets in particular? Bullets are made from heavy metals anyway that would also poison an animal if ingested. Also, how would a bullet made from another metal differ if it was ingested?

Banning lead bullets won't save the California Condor


Since 1980 about $40 million has been spent in an effort to 'save' the California Condor from extinction. For that cost, we now have about 300 living birds...half of them still in captivity.

The condor came to be during an era when very large creatures roamed the land, and left very large carcasses to be scavenged. In addition, the birds watched the seacoasts for beached whales, and other large marine animals.

Today, the giant elk, mammoth, and other super-fauna are extinct, and a beached whale doesn't remain exposed for scavenging any longer than it takes the local beach-front property owner to call for removal.

Therefore, it's only natural that the condor should follow it's natural food sources into extinction.

The effort to 'save' the condor is not only grossly expensive, but wholly unnatural. That is clearly proven by the fact that they do not maintain viable populations when released into the wild...unless they are regularly fed by researchers.

This effort to ban lead bullets is an agenda-driven ploy to restrict shooting...and will have no effect on the survivability of a bird that is already doomed.

Charlie Maxwell —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I find it extremely ludicrous that a state which has voted to allow huge amounts of lead to be added to its water supply in the form of the fluoride waste used for water fluoridation, is worried about this same substance in the form of lead bullets. Fluoride waste used for water fluoridation, along with its high lead content, greatly increases the amount of lead absorbed by those consuming the water due to the fluoride itself. Other countries are removing fluoride since its link to cavities has now been disproved and the EPA scientists have spoken on this many times. David Getoff, CCN —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:14, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply