Open main menu

Comments:Bush calls for US offshore oil exploration

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


Bush Sr was responsible for the iraq-kuwait crisis and Jr will be responsible for destroying the world!

The Bush Administration:

Assholes until the end...


[Citation Needed] QUINTIX (talk) 12:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."


Speaking of citations, here is an interesting perspective on Reid's "Billions" comment. QUINTIX (talk) 12:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Must have more oil! Who cares about supporting renewable sources of energy when we can destroy the environment instead? --78.146.220.66 14:16, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

About time we drill for oil out their. More jobs and less likely we need arab oil. But we need to find a new source of energy. --66.229.25.248 14:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Great, Bush is trying to make every mark he can before he is kicked out of the white house. The donkey. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.145.80 (talk) 15:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Why?Edit

Why the hell did the US oppose or place a moratorium on offshore drilling? It did wonders for the UK economy when they started pumping oil out of the North Sea, and they had pipelines run the oil in to the mainland, not tankers. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

The White House might have difficulty in regulatingrestricting so a non regulated profit might be made. Can you imagine how terrible that would be, an opportunity for people to succeed Anonymous101 (talk) 16:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

DittoEdit

This administration has no shame. They are unrepentantly greedy and uncaring about our environment. Yet they try to claim they have ownership of God. They are hypocrites who will one day pay for their crimes against humanity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raphael s (talkcontribs) 18:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

That sounds like a threat. --78.146.220.66 19:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
True, but isn't a little bitterness understandable? These people have done so much to worsen the global situation, and this is one of their parting shots, I guess. --Wolf m corcoran (talk) 13:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)