Comments:Brazil spots unknown tribe of indigenous people in Amazon jungle
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
"Most of Brazil's indigenous groups have not changed their languages or traditions" | 0 | 03:14, 19 July 2011 |
It's not important | 0 | 15:28, 24 June 2011 |
Comments from feedback form - "It should be less wordy in ord..." | 4 | 20:26, 23 June 2011 |
"Most of Brazil's indigenous groups have not changed their languages or traditions"
This is highly unlikely. I lack a good reference, but I'm from Brazil and know personally anthropologist that study modern tribal changes, such as wearing industrialized clothes, playing football, etc. I'd be bold and say it's common sense here that tribes have been deeply affected by modern civilization.
It should be less wordy in order to improve readability. For example, "...tribe is likely to belong to the pano language group," could instead say, "...tribe likely belongs to the pano language group."