Comments:Australian TV network sprung fabricating live crosses by rival

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Comments from feedback form - "I read the entire article and ..."015:27, 25 August 2011
Confusing...010:30, 25 August 2011

Comments from feedback form - "I read the entire article and ..."

I read the entire article and still have absolutely no idea what it's about.

The article's author uses so many local slang terms that, unless you've already been following the story and know the background information of the story, average readers do not understand..

All I get from this is that some news agency in Australia falsely tricked people into believing they were actually flying around in a helicopter. So what?

It kept going on about some mysterious "search" and some "Live Cross" event that I know nothing about.

216.246.225.161 (talk)15:27, 25 August 2011

Confusing...

...the article doesn't make it clear what a 'cross' is. Many people won't know. It's hard to figure out what the article is about. Especially at first glance.

194.72.120.131 (talk)10:30, 25 August 2011