Comments:Australian Football League's Richmond Tigers beat GWS Giants by 12 points

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion


Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Comments from feedback form - "A few errors on this page made..."204:58, 19 June 2012

Comments from feedback form - "A few errors on this page made..."

A few errors on this page made it obvious it was written by someone with only scant knowledge of the AFL. The link to the Australian Associated Press is broken due to a typo, and the vernacular would be that Richmond had 17 more scoring shots that GWS. Frankly, it provides the reader with the required information, so I wouldn't get too worked up over it though. (talk)01:17, 19 June 2012

You could have simply fixed the spelling error.

Pi zero (talk)01:37, 19 June 2012

Don't agree on the terminology. It is a matter of preference. I've watched the footy on television and they don't call them scoring shots all the time.

LauraHale (talk)04:58, 19 June 2012