Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Diego Grez

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Closing as not successful. --Mike moral ♪♫ 23:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Grez (talk · contribs)

I'm a bit afraid of doing this. I have been for over 2 months there and have written many articles (mainly related to the Chile earthquake). I know I have not the editor privs, but I would like to help deleting spam and blocking those trolls when there's no one around or these kind of situations. If I don't get it, I'll try to improve the points you give me. Thanks in advance. :-S --Diego Grez ^{let's talk} 04:31, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Question Do you plan to appeal your blocks on the other projects? That could be helpful in rectifying any past faults. Benny the mascot (talk) 19:57, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have appealed my blocks on the English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, and both were lifted, although I have to obbey some restrictions on the English Wiki. The Spanish Wikipedia is left :-P --Diego Grez ^{let's talk} 20:05, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I didn't notice that! This could be very helpful in cross-wiki coordination/editing. Benny the mascot (talk) 20:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Question Should I ask for editor privs first or not? Also, I'm gonna withdraw this after someone replies me. --Diego Grez ^{let's talk} 21:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Oppose (mildly) meh... not really active till the beginning of March, Not yet at the two months mark. Also I think the user needs more time around first. --ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 04:39, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for the above reasons. I'm more worried about assimilation into the community rather than policy, though. Give it some more time and you'll have my support. --Thunderhead ^{(t - e - c)} 04:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'll have to disagree with both the above comments. The amount of work in January and February is sufficient I think --RockerballAustralia Rockerball is my sport, not me. 04:50, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose per Thunderhead, mainly. You're a good contributor, and I know you have a fair knowledge of policy, but I'd be comfortable with a little more time around first, say a month or two. Sorry. Tempodivalse [talk] 13:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support He has already written 25 articles. I think he knows the rules quite well. Benny the mascot (talk) 19:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain He has written a lot of articles, but I still think he needs more time then 2 months. Also he has been blocked from other projects (IE: Wikipeida) Irunongames•play 19:54, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a blocked account by my name currently (except es.wikipedia under the name of MisterWiki). --Diego Grez ^{let's talk} 20:01, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Comment I'd like to note he's been conditionally unblocked on en.wiki/ --Mike moral ♪♫ 20:04, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Sorry, but I'd honestly like maybe one more month of activity before I can give my full support. --Mike moral ♪♫ 20:14, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. --Diego Grez ^{let's talk} 20:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Sorry. I trust you, but too soon. Agree with mike. Bawolff ☺☻ 20:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Essentially per Mikemoral. C628 (talk) 21:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Your inflammatory comment crossed a line in my book. --William Saturn (talk) 22:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of the Admin's page or the talk page of the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.