Wikinews:Accreditation requests/Bayfeed

The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Closed as unsuccessful. I see absolutely no need to hold this open longer than a week. The user has not made any response to questions in opposing votes, nor a single additional contribution to the project at all. That, in my mind, makes the actual request frivolous, and a waste of the community's time. Personally, I will look unfavourably upon any subsequent application for accreditation without a demonstration of a commitment to contribute, and to contribute original reporting. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 12:45, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bayfeed (talk)

Name: Tim Hohm

Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Areas of interest: breaking news,events,interviews,human interest stories,

Reason: To bring news information from the San Francisco Bay Area using Video, Photography, and Audio with commentary.

Accomplishments: Producer of the RevTim Podcast, media producer, blogger.

Contact information: timhohm@gmail.com,revtim.com,tim@revtim.com

User ID: Bayfeed

Applied on: 20:44, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Votes

Oppose. Zero contributions other than this request, thou art not extended that level of trust round these parts. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 06:15, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Can you explain why you need accreditation to cover events when you have yet to produce a single article? --LauraHale (talk) 08:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I concur, one should not be granted accreditation until they have produced some quality articles, semonstrating both ability and follow-through. There is no need for accreditation to be a valuable contributor. Accrediatation should be earned. Tadpole256 (talk) 19:38, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.