If you are who we think you are, Pi zero tells me you are a great person and an asset to the project. It seems you feel some animosity towards me, and I would like to resolve that, however, your current behavior feels disruptive to the Wikinews project and I would not be wrong to give you a temporary block per WN:POINT. I would like to resolve this issue for the betterment of Wikinews. Cheers, --SVTCobra 02:48, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- For WN:POINT, one would be disrupting the project to establish a point. Can’t remember trying to establish a point, or disrupting the project. Neither tried to, or want to discuss anything with you. Consider it like this: I may be you know who but I am not parseltongue. You would not understand half the things going on due to lack of continuity, not that I blame you for that. But there are editors who know exactly what I am saying. Block me, I don’t care. 223.237.193.159 (talk) 03:02, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- But you are. It may not be a specific example in the policy, but your never-ending debates are disruptive. You adamantly refuse to see the other side of a person's argument. You post from a myriad of IPs. You revert edits with reasons such as "that's not good enough". But I do not wish to block you. On the other hand, I think you should stop asking for blocks on yourself, and de-reviewer, and resigning your accreditation. What the heck was the purpose of that? If you need a break, just take a break. I know I can be hard-headed, too, but I am not thin-skinned. I don't quit if someone says something I don't like.
- It is detrimental to Wikinews if you decide you don't like SVTCobra, and then attack almost every edit he makes. That's what I consider "disruptive", because the truth is, and I think you have to admit it, most of my edits are beneficial to Wikinews. I have cleared entire backlogs in one day, yet you seem like you want to chase me away. I will treat you with more respect, if you do the same for me. Cheers, --SVTCobra 03:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra: if Pi zero told you about how I am, I am damn sure they would have told you that I actually wanted Wikinewsies older than me to be back on project for ever. You are doing this just because Pi zero told you something, not because you wanted to. If I had triggered POINT, Pi zero would have blocked me, because I have been, for a day. I have some pending work on the project. I need to get it done I am am never coming back, and this time, I mean it. I would eventually lose reviewer right ms due to PeP, best if my name is removed from the list so that it does not give a needy editor false hopes. It so happens that I receive emails for the backlog you have tackled, and since I created these requests, I would make sure it has a proper hearing. Anyway, I think you are doing just because of Pi zero’s remarks. Don’t do it. Despite the edits, I always wanted veterans to be back. But there is no point discussing it.
223.237.255.68 (talk) 07:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra: if Pi zero told you about how I am, I am damn sure they would have told you that I actually wanted Wikinewsies older than me to be back on project for ever. You are doing this just because Pi zero told you something, not because you wanted to. If I had triggered POINT, Pi zero would have blocked me, because I have been, for a day. I have some pending work on the project. I need to get it done I am am never coming back, and this time, I mean it. I would eventually lose reviewer right ms due to PeP, best if my name is removed from the list so that it does not give a needy editor false hopes. It so happens that I receive emails for the backlog you have tackled, and since I created these requests, I would make sure it has a proper hearing. Anyway, I think you are doing just because of Pi zero’s remarks. Don’t do it. Despite the edits, I always wanted veterans to be back. But there is no point discussing it.
[WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute• Torstatus • Rangeblock finder • Global Blocks] [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]
|