If you are who we think you are, Pi zero tells me you are a great person and an asset to the project. It seems you feel some animosity towards me, and I would like to resolve that, however, your current behavior feels disruptive to the Wikinews project and I would not be wrong to give you a temporary block per WN:POINT. I would like to resolve this issue for the betterment of Wikinews. Cheers, --SVTCobra 02:48, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

For WN:POINT, one would be disrupting the project to establish a point. Can’t remember trying to establish a point, or disrupting the project. Neither tried to, or want to discuss anything with you. Consider it like this: I may be you know who but I am not parseltongue. You would not understand half the things going on due to lack of continuity, not that I blame you for that. But there are editors who know exactly what I am saying. Block me, I don’t care. 223.237.193.159 (talk) 03:02, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
But you are. It may not be a specific example in the policy, but your never-ending debates are disruptive. You adamantly refuse to see the other side of a person's argument. You post from a myriad of IPs. You revert edits with reasons such as "that's not good enough". But I do not wish to block you. On the other hand, I think you should stop asking for blocks on yourself, and de-reviewer, and resigning your accreditation. What the heck was the purpose of that? If you need a break, just take a break. I know I can be hard-headed, too, but I am not thin-skinned. I don't quit if someone says something I don't like.
It is detrimental to Wikinews if you decide you don't like SVTCobra, and then attack almost every edit he makes. That's what I consider "disruptive", because the truth is, and I think you have to admit it, most of my edits are beneficial to Wikinews. I have cleared entire backlogs in one day, yet you seem like you want to chase me away. I will treat you with more respect, if you do the same for me. Cheers, --SVTCobra 03:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
@SVTCobra: if Pi zero told you about how I am, I am damn sure they would have told you that I actually wanted Wikinewsies older than me to be back on project for ever. You are doing this just because Pi zero told you something, not because you wanted to. If I had triggered POINT, Pi zero would have blocked me, because I have been, for a day. I have some pending work on the project. I need to get it done I am am never coming back, and this time, I mean it. I would eventually lose reviewer right ms due to PeP, best if my name is removed from the list so that it does not give a needy editor false hopes. It so happens that I receive emails for the backlog you have tackled, and since I created these requests, I would make sure it has a proper hearing. Anyway, I think you are doing just because of Pi zero’s remarks. Don’t do it. Despite the edits, I always wanted veterans to be back. But there is no point discussing it.
223.237.255.68 (talk) 07:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Comment
This is the contributions page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account and/or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.
[WHOISRDNSRBLsTracerouteTorstatusRangeblock finderGlobal Blocks]
[RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]