User:Michael.C.Wright/sandbox

Refresh

Working pages

• Michael.C.Wright/TranslationAnalysis
• Michael.C.Wright/sandbox/timeline
• Michael.C.Wright/sandbox/pre-review
• Michael.C.Wright/sandbox/quotation
• Module:CheckCategory (broken)
• Module:PreReviewStatus (broken)
• User:Michael.C.Wright/review-checklist
• User:Michael.C.Wright/sandbox/The problem

Maintenance tasks

Logical flow of templates:

{{delete}}* ← {{abandoned}} ← {{stale}} ← {{develop}} → {{review}} → {{publish}} → {{archive}}

*Note: {{delete}} is not part of proposed deletion. It is a separate process. Unfortunately, I believe they are found differently from articles marked for speedy deletion.

Check for abandonment

WN:PROD: {{subst:aband}} if not edited in four days

Disputed articles not Abandoned, OR, or Copyvio

• 12 November 2024: Concerns about BioRender copyright licensing spurs interest in beta release of NIH's BioArt public domain repository

Disputed articles not marked as developing, abandoned, OR, or Copyvio

• 12 November 2024: Concerns about BioRender copyright licensing spurs interest in beta release of NIH's BioArt public domain repository

Copyright violations not marked for deletion (mark for deletion after 24 hours)

There are no articles for this topic.

Not in typical queues, not disputed, and not OR

• Main Page 2
• Shropshire
• West Midlands
• AI
• IPCC
• SEC
• Wikisource
• Danish
• St. Petersburg
• Saint Petersburg

Articles in Review

Module:PreReviewStatus (currently borked)

{{#invoke:PreReviewStatus|listArticles|100}}

Test pre-review

Status:    No recommendation; Updated 15:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Version evaluated: URL not provided

• Copyright: Not evaluated
• Newsworthiness: Not evaluated
• Verifiability: Not evaluated
• NPOV: Not evaluated
• Style: Not evaluated

Notes for author(s):

test

Notes for reviewer:

No notes provided for reviewer

Updated notes:

test updated notes

---

This is a pre-review only and is not part of the official review process. A pre-review is meant to help the author or authors improve the article and increase the likelihood of it passing a formal review. This pre-review was not done by a reviewer and represents a recommendation that can be heeded or ignored.

Test tq

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. —Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 14:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Test Verify

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.^[Source] Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.^[Unsourced] Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.^[Source] Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.