Comments from feedback form - "So this article is not neutral..."

Fox News often sets up a back and forth with two guests. The "information" presented on Wikipedia's website during the protest made no allowance for any rebuttal with respect to the claims of fact that were made. How about for your next interview calling up The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation and asking them about where their funding is coming from and what their view of the protest is.

Brian Dell (talk)10:48, 19 January 2012

The ITIF?

Not, based on this page (http://www.itif.org/content/board), someone I'd trust to be "unbiased" about SOPA or PIPA.

Orrin Hatch is well-known to be so deep in the pockets of big media companies that he's covered in lint.

Brian McNeil / talk11:04, 19 January 2012

And Darrell Issa, who's also on the board, isn't the biggest anti-SOPA Congressman on the Hill? Even if they ARE biased, why so scared of hearing an opposing view? The ITIF people happen to know a lot about what's actually in these bills. Instead of interviewing Sue how about arranging a debate between her and someone who disagrees with her?

Brian Dell (talk)00:13, 21 January 2012

It's evident you suffer from a malady all too common in our modern world: you can't recognize neutrality even if you see it. Presumably this malady stems in part from rarely having the opportunity to see it; I prescribe hanging around Wikinews. A Wikinewsie learns to find and present a neutral view of the news, without bias from their own opinions. We all have opinions; the trick is to know where neutrality is, so one knows where one is relative to it.

Pi zero (talk)05:18, 21 January 2012