Because there are better things to do. Considering a river a living, which is pointless (because they aim to protect it), how would you account for flooding? What about the taxes? Moreover, instead of a useless referendum, how about teaching people not to throw litter in open? What are judges for? They are well educated and experienced to make wise decisions. Not an average citizen.

acagastya PING ME!16:31, 30 August 2017

It could force the state to make better provisions against flooding, as well as obliging the state to help those affected by disaster. Could have been a good thing.

121.127.206.113 (talk)06:16, 5 June 2022