Talk:Xinhua says ship carrying hazardous goods sank in China's Yangtze river

Review of revision 905878 [Passed]

Revision 905878 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Quite short, but seems to be enough to avoid {{minimal}}. A nice piece. Tempodivalse [talk] 19:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 905878 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Quite short, but seems to be enough to avoid {{minimal}}. A nice piece. Tempodivalse [talk] 19:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

The title

The title looks a bit odd with "Xinhua says" in it. Unless there is some good reason why we are suspicious of the claim being made, it does not seem the news agency should be a part of the title. --Cspurrier (talk) 19:54, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Everyone is attributing Xinhua. No-one else seems to know anything about it. Chinese state media is notoriously unreliable on domestic affairs. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 20:03, 1 November 2009 (UTC)