Talk:World War II era plane crashes in Connecticut, US, killing at least seven
Thnx for bearing with me guys. Baozon90 (talk) 22:25, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Image
edit@Mikemoral: For your consideration, this is a photo of the exact plane which crashed: File:Boeing B-17G Flying Fortress (299P) AN2050693.jpg. --SVTCobra 00:37, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Oooh, why thanks! I was trying without much success to track down a Twitter photo by an air traffic officer, but I could not find it. This one is certainly much better. —mikemoral (talk · contribs) 00:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Things to fix
edit- Lede has two periods.
- WWII -> World War II or better yet, World War 2
- Better headline would be "At least seven killed as World War 2 plane crashes in southern US state Connecticut"
103.254.128.102 (talk) 04:29, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Well, I won't be adding Connecticut as a "southern state", but I will check the other things before publishing. --SVTCobra 04:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- The Roman numerals are in the Wikinews category, so I don't think '2' is a good replacement. But I might, rephrase the title nonetheless. --SVTCobra 04:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Review of revision 4518502 [Passed]
edit
Revision 4518502 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I know there were time-stamps for the YouTube video, but I watched the whole thing. Professional (paid) reporters are capable of asking the dumbest, most insensitive questions. Anyway, I found this article to be devoid of factual errors except the title said "five" when I started, but this was close to 'breaking news' when writing began, I think. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4518502 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I know there were time-stamps for the YouTube video, but I watched the whole thing. Professional (paid) reporters are capable of asking the dumbest, most insensitive questions. Anyway, I found this article to be devoid of factual errors except the title said "five" when I started, but this was close to 'breaking news' when writing began, I think. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
- Connecticut is currently on summer time, so UTC-4 rather than UTC-5; hence, 9:54am local time would be 1354 UTC. I checked this repeatedly, and then treated it as if it were a typo and self-sighted the correction. --Pi zero (talk) 07:14, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- (Btw, I too listened to a lot of the press conference, and I can only agree that some of the questions were pretty bad.) --Pi zero (talk) 07:16, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Admittedly I did not listen to the whole thing. I was mostly interested in quoting the governor rather than the senator, like either media source. The senator seemed insistent at promoting that he called for the NTSB investigation first, even though that largely seems to be something that NTSB does as part of their job. I did source-check the two media sources though with the commissioner's address. —mikemoral (talk · contribs) 08:46, 3 October 2019 (UTC)