Talk:World Economic Forum security chief found dead on eve of summit

The headline should say that it was security chief of World economic form. no one knows where Davos is/significance of Davos. Bawolff ☺☻ 23:42, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Really? The forum is very commonly referred to as just 'Davos': try searching 'World Economic Forum' on Google news [1]. Plus writing it out in full makes the headline too long imho. the wub "?!" 00:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Your more familiar with the subject then i am, so do what you think is best. To me when i hear Davos, I have no idea what it is, I do roughly know what the world economic fourm is. Bawolff ☺☻ 00:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Maybe I'm just really ignorant, but I agree with Bawolff, I think it should be made more clear that it was the World Economic Forum. Tempodivalse [talk] 00:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

When I first saw it, I thought it was Davros!!! Cirt (talk) 00:32, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

I did double check when I wrote it, I've actually made that mistake before! the wub "?!" 00:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Ok, done. That's what I was originally going to use anyway. the wub "?!" 00:33, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 945177 [Passed]

Revision 945177 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 945177 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.