Talk:Winners and losers on UK's East Coast rail line

Quick comment, should probably explain what open access means. Bawolff ☺☻ 12:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Review

Revision 760351 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 760351 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Doesn't make sense

This doesn't really make sense:

"Open access refers to railways and transportation services that can be available to other interested investors, besides the owners of the companies."

I can't think how to re-write it now, but I think you've missed some words out! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.44.160.188 (talk • contribs)

The passage is from Wikipedia's article. Sadly, that article is badly written and trying to do three jobs at once. I removed it. I think "open access" is explained well without it - once in the article body in brackets and once at the end in more detail. That should do it. Redvers (talk) 21:13, 30 January 2009 (UTC)