Talk:Wikipedia and sister projects prepare new, easier interface
Review of revision 984780 [Passed] edit
 |
Revision 984780 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 05:25, 28 March 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Some would say navel gazing... but the "Wikipedia look" (Monobook for the rest of us) is instantly recognizable to most anyone on the net. It is a top 10 website and changes to how they go about things are big news, even for main stream media. Will be even more funny after it hits. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 984780 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 05:25, 28 March 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Some would say navel gazing... but the "Wikipedia look" (Monobook for the rest of us) is instantly recognizable to most anyone on the net. It is a top 10 website and changes to how they go about things are big news, even for main stream media. Will be even more funny after it hits. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Article tone edit
I'm not sure i like the tone of this article. It seems a bit promo imo. "Easier interface" = says who? That should be attributed to someone or perhaps just dropped from the title. I actually personally find some of the functions of the new interface to be somewhat more difficult to use. Thoughts? Tempodivalse [talk] 01:24, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- We could say that [Person] from Wikimedia said it was designed to be easier Irunongames•play 01:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)