Talk:Wikinews interviews Amber Merritt Australian Paralympic wheelchair basketballer

Audio of interview was uploaded to the journalists' workspace using dropbox.

IPC rules prohibit broadcast. Do not put the audio online. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hawkeye7 (talk • contribs)

• Question has to be: Is that prohibit live broadcast of competition, prohibit broadcast completely, or does it actually prohibit making available audio recordings of interviews not done during the event?

If the latter, then I really hope Wikinews' reportage might push the APC to challenge these overly-restrictive rules. It's a disgusting commercialisation of events that fundamentally are not meant to be for-profit. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 10:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Disqualified from reviewing

I, now, consider myself disqualified from reviewing this.

I've gone through the audio on JWS, and made changes to bring the article transcript text a 95-98% match with that. However, pulling in additional information to give a second lead-in paragraph, and 'detective work' to identify the earlier interview, are substantive enough changes to consider myself disqualified as a reviewer. But, happy on the transcript (which is otherwise the main content work-wise in reviewing). --Brian McNeil / ^talk 11:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1612570 [Passed]

Revision 1612570 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 09:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A little annoyed at having to review this one; my notes on the talk confirmed I'd verified, and made some corrections to, the transcript. I wasn't happy about my involvement level for the other content, which came from the related news. This, from my perspective, is overstepping the limits where reviewer versus author should be. Only a little, admittedly, but we should as review is more-used be getting closer to a clear demarcation - not blurring the line. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1612570 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 09:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A little annoyed at having to review this one; my notes on the talk confirmed I'd verified, and made some corrections to, the transcript. I wasn't happy about my involvement level for the other content, which came from the related news. This, from my perspective, is overstepping the limits where reviewer versus author should be. Only a little, admittedly, but we should as review is more-used be getting closer to a clear demarcation - not blurring the line. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.