Talk:Wikinews Shorts: January 24, 2012
Review of revision 1381064 [Not ready]
edit
Revision 1381064 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:14, 24 January 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I didn't even begin to check the sources, nor to look at the other articles, so it is possible there are other problems lurking. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1381064 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:14, 24 January 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I didn't even begin to check the sources, nor to look at the other articles, so it is possible there are other problems lurking. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- Another point; in the absence of any kind of proper definition (I did look for one on Wikipedia), something should be done about this phrase 'mature economies'; explanation (and attribution if subjective), or replacement with a more suitable term. This is a much more minor issue I might have tried to fix myself but for the more problematic passage above. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 15:16, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Review of revision 1381332 [Passed]
edit
Revision 1381332 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:52, 24 January 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I had to cut away a pair of shorts that weren't verifiable because they cited the FT - which hides much of its content behind a registration wall for most users. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1381332 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:52, 24 January 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I had to cut away a pair of shorts that weren't verifiable because they cited the FT - which hides much of its content behind a registration wall for most users. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |