Talk:Wikinews Shorts: January 10, 2010

Review of revision $1 [Passed]

Revision 934897 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: These are hard work to review :( The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 934897 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: These are hard work to review :( The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Really? I always find them easier to review, i thought it's much easier to verify everything in several two-liners than one full article. Tempodivalse [talk] 14:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

• You have a huge number of sources to check for potential plagiarism. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 14:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)