Talk:Western Australian court to set precedent on the burqa

Review of revision 1073319 [Failed]

Revision 1073319 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 00:41, 7 August 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Rewrite to paraphrase the Perth Now article so closely. This version has the same facts in the same order in sentences of same length. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1073319 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 00:41, 7 August 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Rewrite to paraphrase the Perth Now article so closely. This version has the same facts in the same order in sentences of same length. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1073459 [Failed]

Revision 1073459 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:52, 7 August 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Transposing one sentence doesn't fix the problem cited above. Re-write the first 3 paragraphs in your own words. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1073459 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:52, 7 August 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Transposing one sentence doesn't fix the problem cited above. Re-write the first 3 paragraphs in your own words. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1074031 [Passed]

Revision 1074031 of this article has been reviewed by Nascar1996 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:46, 8 August 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: It is a little short, but is enough to pass review. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1074031 of this article has been reviewed by Nascar1996 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:46, 8 August 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: It is a little short, but is enough to pass review. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.