Talk:Vigil for hate victims takes place in London

http://www.egovmonitor.com/node/30298 - i'm not sure if this qualifies as a reliable source for this article but i thought i would put it here hoping someone might find it helpful. delirious & lost ☯ ^TALK 19:23, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Hmm... Looks ok to me, but I didn't dig too deep. Links back to Boris' office and so on, has a legit 'feel'. I'm not really comfortable however, like you. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 19:25, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

I'm in Canada and was asked on IRC if i could help fill this out before it happens. Every UK news source i know has not yet covered it. Also http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2009/10/30/thousands-expected-to-attent-candle-lit-vigil-in-trafalgar-square/ and http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=19421 . I just am completely unfamiliar with these sources. delirious & lost ☯ ^TALK 19:32, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Both of them have agendas to be aware of, but their perfectly reliable and acceptable sources IMO. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 19:44, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Well there goes my first attempt at significant contribution to a news article. My roommate wants to get groceries and has been on my case to hurry for 20 minutes now. If anyone can tify it up please do. Cheers. delirious & lost ☯ ^TALK 20:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Review of revision 904869 [Passed]

Revision 904869 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:47, 30 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A little less crass on the 'graphic' next time. And don't forget the categories. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 904869 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:47, 30 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A little less crass on the 'graphic' next time. And don't forget the categories. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.