Talk:United States Senator Jeff Flake announces retirement, citing 'profoundly misguided' party politics
Review of revision 4358641 [Not ready] edit
Revision 4358641 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4358641 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- We have established that I cannot tell what you're pointing at from your edit histories alone. I will look at them, but expect limited results. Darkfrog24 (talk) 22:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- Replacing "divisions" with the word "issues" looks like it would address this matter. I see "divisions" as summarizing, not interpreting, but there's nothing wrong with being highly rigorous. Darkfrog24 (talk) 22:36, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Flake has recently published a book, Conscience of a Conservative: A Rejection of Destructive Politics and a Return to Principle edit
I had no idea The Conscience of a Conservative "is a 1960 book published under the name of Arizona Senator and 1964 Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater. It reignited the American conservative movement, made Goldwater a political star, and has influenced countless conservatives in the United States, helping to lay the foundation for the Reagan Revolution of the 1980s." I wonder if this can be incorporated in this story somehow? Ottawahitech (talk) 19:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC) Please ping me (btw wikinews will not let me leave an edit summary)
Review of revision 4359064 [Passed] edit
Revision 4359064 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4359064 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |