Talk:US scientist creates 'artificial life'

Sources

My main source was BBC news media mainly Radio 4's Today program and News 24, the BBC webpages are a recap of on air content. KTo288 (talk) 08:42, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

The first paragraph is a modification of the 2007 article.KTo288 (talk) 08:44, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Peer review

Revision 1024799 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:32, 21 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Fail NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Fail Comments by reviewer: Needs more sources; both cited are BBC News (the radio interview should be cited separately but is still BBC). "Technical tour de force" quote is not present in either source given, where does it come from? Rewrite 4th paragraph; it's really just one sentence that's been split in two. Who is the commentator in the 3rd paragraph? Who compared the discovery to the "atom bomb"? Clean up grammar overall; lots of sentences are inappropriately split in two with periods. Killing Vector (talk) 11:32, 21 May 2010 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1024799 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:32, 21 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Fail NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Fail Comments by reviewer: Needs more sources; both cited are BBC News (the radio interview should be cited separately but is still BBC). "Technical tour de force" quote is not present in either source given, where does it come from? Rewrite 4th paragraph; it's really just one sentence that's been split in two. Who is the commentator in the 3rd paragraph? Who compared the discovery to the "atom bomb"? Clean up grammar overall; lots of sentences are inappropriately split in two with periods. Killing Vector (talk) 11:32, 21 May 2010 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1024869 [Passed]

Revision 1024869 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:25, 21 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1024869 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:25, 21 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Wiki home page

Doesn't it belong in 'In the news' section of wiki home page?

No, this is not Wikipedia. --Diego Grez ^{return fire} 20:25, 21 May 2010 (UTC)