Talk:US prisoner in North Korea 'attempts suicide'

Review of revision 1056928 [Failed]

Revision 1056928 of this article has been reviewed by Amgine (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:39, 9 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Many sentences nearly word-for-word. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: Single english language source. (Original sources probably available online. Why use secondary?) NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Disjointed, does not follow inverted pyramid Comments by reviewer: Excellent start to an article for a new contributor, but clearly not ready for publication. Why did User:Shankarnikhil88 put this up for review? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1056928 of this article has been reviewed by Amgine (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:39, 9 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Many sentences nearly word-for-word. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: Single english language source. (Original sources probably available online. Why use secondary?) NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Disjointed, does not follow inverted pyramid Comments by reviewer: Excellent start to an article for a new contributor, but clearly not ready for publication. Why did User:Shankarnikhil88 put this up for review? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1057526 [Passed]

Revision 1057526 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:33, 10 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good to me. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1057526 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:33, 10 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good to me. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Review of revision 1057526 [Passed]

Revision 1057526 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:36, 10 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good to me. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1057526 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:36, 10 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good to me. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Review of revision 1057526 [Passed]

Revision 1057526 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:42, 10 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Why this did not the first time, I have no idea. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1057526 of this article has been reviewed by C628 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:42, 10 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Why this did not the first time, I have no idea. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.