Talk:US president Obama, Congress call for blocking of executive bonuses at AIG insurance company
npov
editWhat does AIG say? --SVTCobra 21:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hm, good point. Neither source really has any mention of what AIG had to say. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 21:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am looking for the sources, but from what I know about the deal, is that AIG was required under contract to pay the bonuses to employees. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 22:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Found what I could. That is apparently all AIG said was they are legally required to give the bonuses. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 22:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- I added a quote by the CEO in a letter to the Treasury. --SVTCobra 01:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- Found what I could. That is apparently all AIG said was they are legally required to give the bonuses. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 22:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am looking for the sources, but from what I know about the deal, is that AIG was required under contract to pay the bonuses to employees. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 22:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Peer review
edit
Revision 787016 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Story moving too fast. If we keep updating it it'll never get published. Killing Vector (talk) 11:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 787016 of this article has been reviewed by Killing Vector (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Story moving too fast. If we keep updating it it'll never get published. Killing Vector (talk) 11:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Review then develop
editThis should have been published 3 days ago. If there is new news about AIG, then it should get a new article. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 11:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
The environment
editI feel that it is about time that the president and his cabinet take responsibilty for the environmentel issues and the ever increasing presser on oour nature resorses do to over population and mismaniment.Not just this iminastraion but every ather iminastaion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.229.96.38 (talk) 23:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)