Talk:US may not have known of Sgrena rescue operation
MAIN PAGE READY? you've GOT to be kidding.
There are cartoon captions with more words and meat than this "article".
This blog like comment definately qualifies as "patent nonsense"; and is full of POV and uncorroborated insinuations. "It has been reported" "may not have been informed"
The grammar is unreadable..."obtaining them a special badge"
It looks more like a 10 second effort at a blog comment than a news article. Delete. Paulrevere2005 21:58, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I disagree that the article should be deleted. I've read quite a few comic strips in my time, and this article doesn't read like a comic to me.
- I just read the sources cited by the article, and it appears that we have enough info to fix the "it is reported" and "may not have been informed" objections, so I will attempt to address your concerns now.
- — DV 07:21, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- OK, I attributed the anonymous reporting claims, expanded the article with a bit more info, moved the Italian government's objection further up in the article, and added another source (an Associated Press piece).
- Do these edits improve the article beyond "cartoon caption" status? — DV 07:35, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- The article is OK now, as far as I'm concerned. Paulrevere2005 13:42, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you for following up.
- Wikinews gains more credibility when contributors revise articles to respond to constructive criticism. The capability to revise and correct stories is one of Wikinews' greatest strengths.
- Please don't let anyone discourage you from offering more feedback about the quality of Wikinews' articles. — DV 13:53, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Start a discussion about US may not have known of Sgrena rescue operation
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikinews the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve US may not have known of Sgrena rescue operation.
