Talk:US federal agency announces plans to begin presidential transition process following Trump election loss

Country

There needs to be some sort of indication which country this thing is about.
•–• 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

I just edited it to specify the US in the first sentence. Good to submit for review? The Irate Communist (talk) 03:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

In the title. "Trump administration" does not make sense outside the US. And tbh, I have no clue what the headline is trying to say. Write from the perspective of the global audience.
•–• 03:09, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Oh sorry my bad, that was never meant to be the actual title. The Irate Communist (talk) 03:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

How's the current title? --The Irate Communist (talk) 03:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Defeat

I'm dubious of the assertion that Biden defeated Trump on November 3. (We don't abbreviate months, btw.) The elaborate, multi-step process, and the nitpicking being engaged in, seem to call for a more precise or at least more cautious description of what happened. --Pi zero (talk) 03:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

How is "following the 2020 US Presidential Election on November 3, which former US Vice President Joe Biden is projected to have won against incumbent US President Donald Trump."? --The Irate Communist (talk) 03:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

That's closer. One or two words on who did the projecting would be appropriate. --Pi zero (talk) 03:36, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Let me know if my latest edit will work --The Irate Communist (talk) 03:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

"all" seems problematic; a tweak of some sort is wanted. What did we say in the earlier article? --Pi zero (talk) 03:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Peaceful transfer of power

If I were reviewing this now (which I'm not; I do need to sleep), a particular point I would be weighing carefully, as I study this article and the sources, is exactly what this process actually does; I've gotten the impression it's not actually a process of transferring power, but rather a process of preparing to do so in case a transfer of power takes place. --Pi zero (talk) 04:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Oooh alright. I'm realizing "transfer of power" specifically refers to the Presidential inauguration, that helps. The Irate Communist (talk) 05:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Working on this now. --The Irate Communist (talk) 02:39, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Suggested image for article - Trump recommending GSA Emily W Murphy ascertain Biden

Trump recommending GSA Emily W Murphy ascertain Biden

Suggested image for article - Trump recommending GSA Emily W Murphy ascertain Biden.

Potential sources to use along with image:

• Peter Weber. "Trump suggests he green-lighted the Biden transition. GSA head Emily Murphy, other allies disagree" — The Week, 24 November 2020
• Brian Naylor. "President-Elect Biden To Begin Formal Transition Process After Agency OK" — NPR, 23 November 2020
• Michael D. Shear, Maggie Haberman, Nick Corasaniti, Jim Rutenberg. "Trump Administration Approves Start of Formal Transition to Biden - A key official designated President-elect Joe Biden as the apparent winner after Michigan certified his victory there and President Trump lost another court decision in Pennsylvania." — The New York Times, 23 November 2020

Thank you, Right cite (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

God bless........

.....all the yammering about this article, but: an action needs to be taken on it publishing-wise. Annoyingly, I don't have the time right now to do that myself. --Bddpaux (talk) 19:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

It seems like User:Pi zero is on it. --The Irate Communist (talk) 19:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Another update: a Trump lawyer plans challenging the certification

According to the CNBC article, a Trump lawyer announces plans to use whatever it takes, like long and complicated process, to challenge the certification and to ask the General Assembly to select electors before the December 14 Electoral College. If the newer info goes on top, then the article must be somewhat rewritten to reflect the info. --George Ho (talk) 21:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm not really seeing why one more legal challenge would significantly impact this article. --Pi zero (talk) 23:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Review of revision 4593817 [Passed]

Revision 4593817 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:02, 26 November 2020 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4593817 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:02, 26 November 2020 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.