Talk:US President Biden signals support for bill to repeal authorizations for use of military force against Iraq

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Heavy Water in topic Review of revision 4717321 [Passed]

Added archived link to GovTrack.us edit

The archived version is from two days after I cited it. However, the pertinent info — 44 cosponsors and date of drafting/introduction — is present in the archived version. Michael.C.Wright (talk) 00:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Michael.C.Wright: I am concerned about NPOV here. Not in the phrasing of the article, but in the fact that it only includes quotes supportive of the repeal. Granted, so do the sources, but it should not be so hard to find opposing perspectives. Heavy Water (talk) 21:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay. I'll see what I can dig up. Michael.C.Wright (talk) 23:12, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Done I naively thought it would be hard to find an article discussing opposition. Good catch. Sorry that was in my blind spot. Michael.C.Wright (talk) 23:29, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
No problem. Heavy Water (talk) 23:40, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Grammar question edit

Should the "no vote" in following statement "Lee was the sole no vote..." by hyphenated and also enclosed in quotes? As written, it's a compound modifier of Lee, so I think it should be hyphenated. A Wapo article uses similar verbiage and the author there just enclosed the "no" in quotes[1].

Michael.C.Wright (talk) 23:41, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Quotes, yes, that makes sense. A hyphen doesn't seem necessary to me, but you can always add it. Heavy Water (talk) 23:58, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Review of revision 4717321 [Passed] edit

Return to "US President Biden signals support for bill to repeal authorizations for use of military force against Iraq" page.