Talk:US President Biden signals support for bill to repeal authorizations for use of military force against Iraq
Added archived link to GovTrack.us
editThe archived version is from two days after I cited it. However, the pertinent info — 44 cosponsors and date of drafting/introduction — is present in the archived version. Michael.C.Wright (talk) 00:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Michael.C.Wright: I am concerned about NPOV here. Not in the phrasing of the article, but in the fact that it only includes quotes supportive of the repeal. Granted, so do the sources, but it should not be so hard to find opposing perspectives. Heavy Water (talk) 21:51, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Okay. I'll see what I can dig up. Michael.C.Wright (talk) 23:12, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Done I naively thought it would be hard to find an article discussing opposition. Good catch. Sorry that was in my blind spot. Michael.C.Wright (talk) 23:29, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. Heavy Water (talk) 23:40, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Grammar question
editShould the "no vote" in following statement "Lee was the sole no vote..." by hyphenated and also enclosed in quotes? As written, it's a compound modifier of Lee, so I think it should be hyphenated. A Wapo article uses similar verbiage and the author there just enclosed the "no" in quotes[1].
Michael.C.Wright (talk) 23:41, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Quotes, yes, that makes sense. A hyphen doesn't seem necessary to me, but you can always add it. Heavy Water (talk) 23:58, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Review of revision 4717321 [Passed]
edit
Revision 4717321 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: @Michael.C.Wright: Good work! Please see the edit history for some style things to address in the future. Others, note: Insider is partially paywalled, and this is an article not behind the paywall; and many facts in this article are sourced from the March 11 one in Related news, as is common practice and is permitted by WN:CS. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4717321 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:42, 23 March 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: @Michael.C.Wright: Good work! Please see the edit history for some style things to address in the future. Others, note: Insider is partially paywalled, and this is an article not behind the paywall; and many facts in this article are sourced from the March 11 one in Related news, as is common practice and is permitted by WN:CS. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |