Talk:US: Tulsa residents approve $814 million infrastructure package

Review of revision 4741026 [Passed]

Revision 4741026 of this article has been reviewed by Tyrol5 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I did a bit more meddling than I would otherwise like to as a Reviewer on this one; however, this was understandable since it appears to be a first stab (and a decent one at that). Though I have held off on mucking with much of the substance (barring brining the article into alignment with the provided sources in a few spots), I gather from the sources that the package at question here is a cumulative one which includes a bond issuance, but is not exclusively a bond issuance (despite the slightly misleading headline from one of the sources). Would note also that this one is very nearly stale, though fully recognize this is out of the control of the writer. In the future, however, adding additional developments or subsequent details is a good way to keep the article "fresh" while it awaits review. Please see article history for further comments, all incorporated herein. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4741026 of this article has been reviewed by Tyrol5 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I did a bit more meddling than I would otherwise like to as a Reviewer on this one; however, this was understandable since it appears to be a first stab (and a decent one at that). Though I have held off on mucking with much of the substance (barring brining the article into alignment with the provided sources in a few spots), I gather from the sources that the package at question here is a cumulative one which includes a bond issuance, but is not exclusively a bond issuance (despite the slightly misleading headline from one of the sources). Would note also that this one is very nearly stale, though fully recognize this is out of the control of the writer. In the future, however, adding additional developments or subsequent details is a good way to keep the article "fresh" while it awaits review. Please see article history for further comments, all incorporated herein. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.