Talk:UN nuclear chief says negotiations with Iran at 'dead end'

Review of revision 916683 [Passed]

Revision 916683 of this article has been reviewed by The New Mikemoral (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:55, 27 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good and I saw nothing major or any copyedits needed. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 916683 of this article has been reviewed by The New Mikemoral (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:55, 27 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good and I saw nothing major or any copyedits needed. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

title dup.

two withs in title. needs to be fixed. cheers. 71.254.111.231 (talk) 01:19, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

fixed. And to think this was main lead ... how how embarrassing. Tempodivalse [talk] 01:23, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

(edit conflict) How could I miss something so obvious!? Sorry... --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 01:25, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

It's partially my fault as well, i created the article. Today is not my day ... I duplicated words again in my comment above. Heh heh. :-) Oh well, hopefully not to much damage was done. Tempodivalse [talk] 01:34, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

At least the grammar and spelling needed no fixes. --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 01:39, 28 November 2009 (UTC)